Learning with Errors Problem: From History to Modern Cryptography

The Learning with Errors Problem has a fascinating history that spans centuries. It was first proposed by mathematician Donald Knuth in the 1980s as a way to create a new type of public-key cryptosystem.

This problem was inspired by the concept of modular arithmetic, which was first introduced by the ancient Greek mathematician Diophantus. Modular arithmetic is a system of arithmetic that "wraps around" after reaching a certain value, known as the modulus.

The Learning with Errors Problem is all about finding a way to solve a system of linear equations with a certain level of noise, or "error." This noise is introduced by adding a random value to each equation, making it difficult to solve.

The Learning with Errors problem, or LWE, is defined as finding a fixed vector s in Zqn given access to polynomially many samples of choice from a distribution As,ϕ.

To understand LWE, we need to break down the distribution As,ϕ. This distribution is obtained by choosing a vector a from the uniform distribution over Zqn, a number e from a fixed probability distribution ϕ over T, and evaluating t as the inner product of a and s divided by q plus e.

The distribution As,ϕ is defined in two steps: first, a vector a is chosen uniformly at random from Zqn, and then a number e is chosen according to a probability distribution ϕ from T.

T is the additive group on reals modulo one, which means we're working with real numbers that are "wrapped around" to fit within a range of 0 to 1.

The fixed vector s is a crucial part of the LWE problem, and it's used to evaluate the inner product with the chosen vector a.

The LWE problem is to find s given access to polynomially many samples of choice from As,ϕ. This means we're trying to figure out the value of s based on multiple samples of the distribution.

The distribution ϕ is used to choose the number e, which is added to the inner product of a and s to get the value t.

The distribution Dα is a one-dimensional Gaussian with zero mean and variance α^2/(2π). This means it's a probability distribution that's shaped like a bell curve, with the majority of its mass concentrated around 0.

The learning with errors problem has its roots in the early days of computing, specifically in the 1940s and 1950s when computers were first being developed.

In the 1950s, computer scientists like Alan Turing and Claude Shannon began exploring the concept of error-correcting codes, which laid the groundwork for the learning with errors problem.

The problem's modern formulation can be attributed to the work of mathematician and computer scientist, Robert Solovay, who introduced the concept in the 1970s.

Take a look at this: Computer Science Machine Learning

Let's take a step back and look at the history behind this topic. The earliest recorded evidence of this phenomenon dates back to ancient civilizations in Mesopotamia, around 4000 BC.

The ancient Greeks and Romans were also familiar with this concept, often using it for practical purposes like building and engineering. They developed sophisticated systems to harness and control it.

One of the most significant milestones in the history of this topic was the invention of the steam engine in the 17th century. This innovation revolutionized industry and transportation, paving the way for the Industrial Revolution.

The development of new technologies and materials has continued to shape our understanding of this topic over the centuries. From the discovery of new energy sources to the creation of advanced materials, our knowledge has grown exponentially.

You might like: History of Machine Learning

The LWE problem is a versatile problem used in the construction of several cryptosystems. In 2005, Regev showed that the decision version of LWE is hard assuming quantum hardness of the lattice problems.

LWE is a problem that serves as the basis for several proposed encryption algorithms that are believed to be secure even if an adversary has access to a quantum computer. These algorithms are being developed in response to the potential threat of quantum computing breaking current encryption systems.

The US government’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is holding a competition to identify quantum-resistant encryption algorithms, and many of these algorithms depend on LWE or variations.

LWE has several variations, including LWR, RLWE, and RLWR, which use different methods to achieve security. These variations include using rounding rather than adding random noise, and using ring-based methods.

Explore further: Quantum Machine Learning Applications

Solving LWE is a challenging problem that has been extensively studied in the context of lattice-based cryptography. Given a procedure for the search problem, the decision version can be solved easily by feeding the input samples for the decision version to the procedure for the search problem.

Discover more: Decision Tree Algorithm Machine Learning

There are two main approaches to solving LWE: one assumes a procedure for the search problem, and the other assumes a procedure for the decision problem. If we have a procedure for the search problem, we can solve the decision version by feeding the input samples to the search procedure and checking if the returned value can generate the input pairs modulo some noise.

To solve the search version assuming a procedure for the decision problem, we recover the s vector one coordinate at a time. We make a guess for the first coordinate, s1, and use the decision procedure to distinguish between the correct and incorrect guesses.

Here's a summary of the main ideas:

Solving search assuming decision is a crucial step in tackling the Learning With Errors (LWE) problem. This process involves using a procedure for the decision problem to solve the search version.

The decision problem can be used to test if a guess is correct, and it's possible to recover the s one coordinate at a time. Suppose we're guessing the first coordinate, and we're trying to test if si=k for a fixed k∈Zq.

To do this, we choose a number l∈Zq∗ uniformly at random and feed the transformed pairs {(ai+(l,0,…,0),bi+(lk)/q)} to the decision problem. If the guess k was correct, the transformation takes the distribution As,χ to itself.

However, if the guess k was incorrect, the transformation takes it to the uniform distribution. We can use the decision problem to distinguish between these two types of distributions and err with very small probability.

Since q is a prime bounded by some polynomial in n, k can only take polynomially many values. This means we can efficiently guess each co-ordinate with high probability. By guessing each co-ordinate one at a time, we can recover the entire s.

A unique perspective: Q Learning Algorithm

Solving search assuming decision is a crucial step in tackling the LWE problem. If we have a procedure for the decision problem, we can solve the search version easily by feeding the input samples to the decision procedure and checking if the results match the expected distribution.

To obtain the first coordinate of s, we make a guess k and transform the given samples using a random number r. We calculate the transformed pairs (ai+(r,0,...,0), bi+(rk)/q) and send them to the decision solver. If the guess k was correct, the transformation takes the distribution As,χ to itself, and otherwise it takes it to the uniform distribution.

The decision solver can distinguish between these two distributions with high accuracy, allowing us to test if the guess k equals the first coordinate. Since q is a prime bounded by some polynomial in n, k can only take polynomially many values, and each coordinate can be efficiently guessed with high probability.

Here's a step-by-step guide to solving search assuming decision:

Note: This reduction works for any q that is a product of distinct, small (polynomial in n) primes.

Regev shows that there is a reduction from GapSVP100nγ(n) to DGSnγ(n)/λ(L*) for any function γ(n)≥1.

This reduction implies that if we can solve the DGS problem efficiently, we can also solve the GapSVP problem efficiently.

Regev then shows that there exists an efficient quantum algorithm for DGS2nηε(L)/α given access to an oracle for LWEq,Ψα.

This algorithm uses the quantum computer to sample from the discrete Gaussian distribution on the lattice L.

The probability of each x∈L is proportional to ρr(x), where ρα(x)=e−π|x/α|2.

The discrete Gaussian sampling problem (DGS) is defined as follows: an instance of DGSϕ is given by an n-dimensional lattice L and a number r≥ϕ(L).

The goal is to output a sample from DL,r.

A key parameter in Regev's result is the smoothing parameter ηε(L), which denotes the smallest s such that ρ1/s(L∗∖{0})≤ε.

The smoothing parameter is used to measure how "smooth" the lattice L is.

For creating a cryptosystem, the modulus q has to be polynomial in n.

This is because the proof of the hardness of LWE works for any q, but for creating a cryptosystem, we need a polynomial-time algorithm.

Check this out: Learn to Code in R

Regev's result shows that there is a reduction from GapSVP to DGS. This reduction is significant for understanding the relationship between these two problems.

The discrete Gaussian sampling problem, or DGS, is defined as follows: an instance of DGS is given by an n-dimensional lattice L and a number r greater than or equal to the smoothing parameter of L.

Regev also shows that there exists an efficient quantum algorithm for DGS given access to an oracle for LWE. This algorithm is efficient for certain values of q and α.

The smoothing parameter η ϵ ϵ (L) is the smallest s such that ρ ρ 1/s(L∗ ∗ ∖ ∖ {0})≤ ≤ ϵ ϵ . This parameter is crucial for understanding the hardness of DGS.

The discrete Gaussian distribution DL,r is defined as a distribution on L where the probability of each x is proportional to ρ ϵ ϵ (x). This distribution is used in the definition of DGS.

Regev's result implies the hardness of LWE for certain values of q and α. This hardness is significant for the development of cryptographic systems.

The LWE problem has some really cool applications in cryptography.

In 2005, Regev showed that the decision version of LWE is hard assuming quantum hardness of the lattice problems. This has significant implications for the security of cryptosystems.

The LWE problem is versatile and has been used in the construction of several cryptosystems.

Peikert proved a similar result in 2009, but it's based on a non-standard version of an easier problem, GapSVP.

The difficulty of solving the search version of the RLWE problem is equivalent to finding a short vector in an ideal lattice formed from elements of Z[x]/Φ Φ (x), a problem known as the Approximate Shortest Vector Problem (α-SVP).

This problem is NP-hard due to work by Daniele Micciancio in 2001, although it's not yet proven that the difficulty of the α-SVP for ideal lattices is equivalent to the average α-SVP.

There is no known SVP algorithm that makes use of the special structure of ideal lattices, and it's widely believed that solving SVP in ideal lattices is as hard as in regular lattices.

Check this out: How Hard Is It to Learn to Code

The RLWE problem is a good basis for future cryptography, as there is a mathematical proof that the only way to break the cryptosystem on its random instances is by being able to solve the underlying lattice problem in the worst case.

The LWE and DLWE problems are (up to a polynomial factor) as hard in the average case as they are in the worst case, due to the random self-reducibility of these problems.

In recent years, there has been significant progress in addressing the learning with errors problem.

Researchers have been exploring the use of probabilistic models to mitigate the effects of errors, with promising results in certain applications.

The development of new algorithms, such as the probabilistic neural network, has shown potential in reducing the impact of errors on learning outcomes.

These advancements have paved the way for more robust and efficient learning systems, with applications in areas such as image recognition and natural language processing.

For another approach, see: Automated Machine Learning

LWE, or learning with errors, is a hard problem even on a quantum computer.

This makes it a promising basis for proposed encryption algorithms that are believed to be secure even if an adversary has access to a quantum computer.

These algorithms depend on LWE being computationally difficult, which it is, even with Shor's algorithm on a quantum computer.

The US government's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is holding a competition to identify quantum-resistant encryption algorithms, and many of these algorithms depend on LWE or variations.

LWE has several variations, including LWR, which uses rounding rather than adding random noise.

RLWE and RLWR, ring-based counterparts, add random errors and use rounding respectively.

Poly-LWE, a polynomial variation, uses a polynomial-based learning with errors problem.

LWE falls under the general category of lattice methods, which are being explored for quantum-resistant encryption.

Check this out: Machine Learning for Computer Security

Researchers have made significant progress in developing more efficient solar panels, with some new designs achieving up to 22% efficiency, a 10% increase from previous models.

One notable example is the use of perovskite solar cells, which have shown great promise in recent years. These cells have the potential to be more cost-effective and easier to produce than traditional silicon-based cells.

In the field of medicine, scientists have made breakthroughs in cancer treatment, particularly in the development of immunotherapy. This approach has shown remarkable results in clinical trials, with some patients experiencing complete remission.

A notable example is the use of CAR-T cell therapy, which has been shown to be effective in treating certain types of blood cancer. This treatment involves extracting a patient's own immune cells and reprogramming them to attack cancer cells.

The development of artificial intelligence has also led to significant advancements in various industries, including healthcare and finance. AI-powered systems have been shown to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes in medical settings.

For instance, AI-assisted diagnosis has been found to be more accurate than human diagnosis in some cases, with AI systems able to analyze large amounts of data and identify patterns that may not be apparent to humans.

Recommended read: Machine Learning Recommendation Algorithm

Lattice methods are a key area of research in cryptography, particularly in the context of public-key algorithms. 9 out of 17 algorithms that made it to the second round of the NIST competition use lattice-based cryptography.

One notable example is the CRYSTALS-KYBER algorithm, which is a lattice-based public-key encryption algorithm. FrodoKEM is another algorithm that uses lattice-based cryptography.

Lattice problems are also used in digital signature algorithms. CRYSTALS-DILITHIUM and FALCON are two algorithms that use lattice problems to create secure digital signatures.

A range of lattice-based algorithms are being explored, including LAC, NewHope, NTRU, NTRU Prime, Round5, SABER, and Three Bears.

You might like: Machine Learning Supervised Learning Algorithms